Henry Ventrue wrote:
I think the present day comics are a lot better than they used to be. I'm referring both to the themes and the awesome sexiness found in comics like WitchBlade, Fathom, etc.
God, I've got catching up to do. I still haven't read
any of those yet.
Henry Ventrue wrote:
I really hate the Marvel Comic books, they are so cheesy.
Marvel was great during the '90s, but by the Double-Ought years the "House of Ideas" had run out of ideas. Civil War? Yeah, that story's been brewing since the '70s. Know why they did it? Because they
ran out of other ideas. If they hadn't, they'd have been dragging that story out longer or putting it off more. Comic companies only pull out all the stops because they've got nothing better to do story-wise and they're losing readers by the buckets.
Henry Ventrue wrote:
There are many undiscovered gems out there.
I highly recommend Midnight Nation , Bad Kitty, F.V.Z.A and IZombie.
There is also a 4 issue comic called Transhuman. It had an immense affect on me. It explains the futility of the trans-humanist movement.
That one
especially intrigues me. I've been fascinated by the transhumanist movement, but I never could see the logic in it. Everybody incorporates technology into their bodies. Nuclear war happens. An EMP goes off. Suddenly, we have a planet filled with lifeless, rotting cyborgs. Nice job, transhumanists.
Henry Ventrue wrote:
There are also there comics : Chastity , BloodRayne and Durham Red. Very well done, but I can't figure out why they look the same. All three characters have red hair, fangs, awesome figure

, and vampiric traits. The only thing different is the timeline.
That description alone makes me want to read these. Wasn't
Chastity put out by the same guys who did
Lady Death?
Henry Ventrue wrote:
Also there is Transmetropolitan, a cyber-punk spin off to that movie Fear and Loathing in Las Vegas.
Downloaded that recently with the intent to read. I've heard much good about Spider Jerusalem's journalistic antics.
Henry Ventrue wrote:
Comic books truly came a long way. Now they explore subjects other than superhero versus bad guy stuff. If this was the Silver Age or Golden Age of comic books, I probably wouldn't be a fan.
I don't mind the superhero stuff, as long as it's done
well. For me, the greatest examples of a superhero done right would be Golden Age Batman and Silver Age Spider-Man.
Golden Age
Batman (circa 1930s-1940s) began as the Dark Knight we saw in the films
Batman Begins and
The Dark Knight: a vengeful "living wraith" who preyed upon the criminals. Operating in Depression Era Gotham City (a pastiche of New York and Chicago), he was the ultimate metaphor for an urban populace who were growing increasingly restless and desperate during a time when food was scarce and a good paying job (that
wasn't illegal) was hard to come by. As the Great Depression had made some so desperate they turned to crime or joined the Mob, a voiceless populace - especially young males, who wanted to take their place in society while they were simultaneously disgusted by its injustices and frustrated by their lack of ability to do anything about it - flocked to a fictional hero who embodied their own struggle to fight that injustice. Sure, Batman was wealthy, but the tragic death of his parents made him sympathetic: during the Great Depression
all individuals were hit hard by economic hardships and the resulting high crime rate, and not even the rich were spared. Even his villains, goofy Dick Tracey rejects that they were, all served as metaphors: the Penguin, a crime boss representative of the Mafia's hold on the masses, growing ever fatter off of society's misery and desperation, a stereotypical "stuffed suit" (
penguin suit, one would say) who cared more about his wealth and his upper-class appearance and less about those his goons terrorized; Catwoman, a cat burglar who took her name a little
too literally, serving as both villain and heroine - a villain at times, for many readers had been victimized by burglars seeking something to pawn off for money, and a heroine to those who wanted to play Robin Hood and "rob from the rich", as she did; and the Joker, a sadistic murderer with a comedy fetish, a man who laughed at others' misery and served as a metaphor for the chaos brought by organized (and in his case,
disorganized) crime.
We look at Batman today, and we see silly, goofy comic book shlock being re-imagined as "darker" and "grittier" to lure in new readers. This is because we are
seventy years removed from the metaphors the story was meant to manifest. Batman was
always dark and gritty. Marketing gurus made him cheesy later on ("Holy Adam West, Batman!"), and that's a mistake the comics industry is
still trying to overcome. Regardless, when you look at Golden Age Batman (and the modern efforts by comic writers like Jeph Loeb, Frank Miller, Alan Grant and Grant Morrison to return the character to his Golden Age roots), you see a superhero done
right.
Silver Age
Spider-Man (circa 1960s-1970s) was the hero we're all familiar with: a down-on-his-luck, depressingly geeky loner teen who is suddenly granted powers that not only give him everything he ever wanted - great strength, speed and agility (to beat back the bullies with
and beat 'em all at sports) and the body of an Adonis (which, in the adolescent male's mind, would help "get the chicks") - but were wicked cool as well. (C'mon, a
spider! I'm an arachnophobe, and
I'll admit spiders are cool!) He gets these powers, tries to make money with them (and is it
wrong to make money off of your God-given
skills?), gets greedy and loses his uncle in the process because he fails to use his skills responsibly. His story taught an important lesson, and the character served as an embodiment of the teenage frustrations of all his readers: the drive to use their skills to succeed in life and finally be free of the shackles of youth as society places the wearying shackles of adulthood in their place instead, the desire to achieve our dreams (beat the bully, get the girl, see your name in lights) versus the day-to-day responsibilities we all face (family problems, taking care of aging parents, paying the bills, getting a real job).
Marvel's problem with Spider-Man is that they wouldn't let him
change much past that. The concept is great, but they keep trying to lock him into the "teenage/young adult" mode by getting rid of any serious love interest so he can get into one ill-fated relationship after another. (In other words: they gave up on a great dramatic story - the responsibility of being
married and starting a family - in favor of shlocky teen/young adult drama, like all the other "90210"/"The O.C." style dreck out there.) When they
do change an aspect, it's for marketing purposes: having him join superteams so they can sell action figures and get tossed into one fantastic situation (working for Tony Stark?) after another (joining the Fantastic Four??) instead of keeping him grounded in the day-to-day (focusing on, oh, I don't know,
being a good high school teacher, a plot point J. Michael Straczynski introduced that Marvel never did anything with after - or even
during - his run on
Amazing Spider-Man) and
telling good stories. Modern Spidey? They screwed him up in the mid-'90s. (The abysmal Clone Saga was the end of him.) Spidey during the Silver Age? That was a superhero done
right.
We need more living metaphors like that in our stories, but the industry is too busy churning out whatever dreck the company suits think will turn a profit to actually bother with
quality work.