View unanswered posts | View active topics It is currently Sat May 25, 2013 11:06 am




Post new topic This topic is locked, you cannot edit posts or make further replies.
Search for:
 [ 105 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7  Next
 Another hostage beheaded - Saudi Arabia; al-Qaeda the culprit 
Author Message
Nessus
User avatar

Joined: February 2002
Posts: 5603
Location: Los Angeles, CA
Gender: Female
Post 
surlymcdouchebag wrote:
yup... thank you CBS... the media has taken the 1st amendment way too far... that's where the insurgents learned about Abu Ghraib, the good ol' American Intel leak that is the media

Apology accepted.


And it is not the media's fault.
It is the RESPONSIBILITY of the media to leak information like that. So don't blame some ephemeral "liberal media" for doing their job. Maybe if the MP's who were charged weren't a bunch of fucking redneck barbarians, then that mess would have never broke the wire. So let's not go bleeding camo and sweeping the misdeeds of the military under the rug in favor of hollering about the so-called "liberal media".

And I sincerely doubt that the press in the Arab world would have not found out about that and leaked it all over Al-Jazeera first.

Americans abusing prisoners (not the guilty, per se, just people who were being held) isn't going to ever stay a secret for long.


Regardless, the Abu Gharib prison scandal has nothing to do with the actions of Al Qaeda. Al Qaeda could care less about the Iraqi's except perhaps using them as an opportunity to kill more non-Arabs.



~blood rose~

_________________
Goth.Net Samurai of Flaming


pink versus black - black versus magenta
this picture of you - just melts in my agenda


Tue Jun 22, 2004 12:32 pm
Profile WWW
Cania
User avatar

Joined: December 2002
Posts: 1949
Location: The mountin home of wind and rain.
Gender: None specified
Post 
Oh so letting the american citizens what is happening elsewhere, that their brothers and other relatives are up to, or could be doing is now wrong is it?

_________________
Theres my musings.
Americans will put up with anything provided it doesn't block traffic. - Dan Rather


Tue Jun 22, 2004 12:33 pm
Profile
Nessus
User avatar

Joined: September 2002
Posts: 4383
Location: Hollywood, California
Gender: None specified
Post 
surlymcdouchebag wrote:
yup... thank you CBS... the media has taken the 1st amendment way too far... that's where the insurgents learned about Abu Ghraib, the good ol' American Intel leak that is the media

You don't think that they and everyone else had a right to know what happened in that prison?

How would you feel if the terrorist acts perpetrated upon American citizens were hidden from us?

_________________
"The sleep of reason breeds monsters" ~Francisco de Goya

"You see, to them you're just a freak . . . like me!" ~The Joker


Tue Jun 22, 2004 12:35 pm
Profile ICQ
Cania
User avatar

Joined: October 2002
Posts: 1927
Location: Denver, Colorado
Gender: Male
Post 
/div wrote:
How would you feel if the terrorist acts perpetrated upon American citizens were hidden from us?


Funny you should say that, my friend.

I know this is a bit off topic, but considering I recieved this in an email at the very moment I read your post, I thought it too serendipitous to pass up:

/div wrote:

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

June 22, 2004
OP-ED COLUMNIST
Noonday in the Shade
By PAUL KRUGMAN

n April 2003, John Ashcroft's Justice Department disrupted what appears to have been a horrifying terrorist plot. In the small town of Noonday, Tex., F.B.I. agents discovered a weapons cache containing fully automatic machine guns, remote-controlled explosive devices disguised as briefcases, 60 pipe bombs and a chemical weapon a cyanide bomb big enough to kill everyone in a 30,000-square-foot building.

Strangely, though, the attorney general didn't call a press conference to announce the discovery of the weapons cache, or the arrest of William Krar, its owner. He didn't even issue a press release. This was, to say the least, out of character. Jose Padilla, the accused "dirty bomber," didn't have any bomb-making material or even a plausible way to acquire such material, yet Mr. Ashcroft put him on front pages around the world. Mr. Krar was caught with an actual chemical bomb, yet Mr. Ashcroft acted as if nothing had happened.

Incidentally, if Mr. Ashcroft's intention was to keep the case low-profile, the media have been highly cooperative. To this day, the Noonday conspiracy has received little national coverage.

At this point, I have the usual problem. Writing about John Ashcroft poses the same difficulties as writing about the Bush administration in general, only more so: the truth about his malfeasance is so extreme that it's hard to avoid sounding shrill.

In this case, it sounds over the top to accuse Mr. Ashcroft of trying to bury news about terrorists who don't fit his preferred story line. Yet it's hard to believe that William Krar wouldn't have become a household name if he had been a Muslim, or even a leftist. Was Mr. Ashcroft, who once gave an interview with Southern Partisan magazine in which he praised "Southern patriots" like Jefferson Davis, reluctant to publicize the case of a terrorist who happened to be a white supremacist?

More important, is Mr. Ashcroft neglecting real threats to the public because of his ideological biases?

Mr. Krar's arrest was the result not of a determined law enforcement effort against domestic terrorists, but of a fluke: when he sent a package containing counterfeit U.N. and Defense Intelligence Agency credentials to an associate in New Jersey, it was delivered to the wrong address. Luckily, the recipient opened the package and contacted the F.B.I. But for that fluke, we might well have found ourselves facing another Oklahoma City-type atrocity.

The discovery of the Texas cyanide bomb should have served as a wake-up call: 9/11 has focused our attention on the threat from Islamic radicals, but murderous right-wing fanatics are still out there. The concerns of the Justice Department, however, appear to lie elsewhere. Two weeks ago a representative of the F.B.I. appealed to an industry group for help in combating what, he told the audience, the F.B.I. regards as the country's leading domestic terrorist threat: ecological and animal rights extremists.

Even in the fight against foreign terrorists, Mr. Ashcroft's political leanings have distorted policy. Mr. Ashcroft is very close to the gun lobby and these ties evidently trump public protection. After 9/11, he ordered that all government lists including voter registration, immigration and driver's license lists be checked for links to terrorists. All government lists, that is, except one: he specifically prohibited the F.B.I. from examining background checks on gun purchasers.

Mr. Ashcroft told Congress that the law prohibits the use of those background checks for other purposes but he didn't tell Congress that his own staff had concluded that no such prohibition exists. Mr. Ashcroft issued a directive, later put into law, requiring that records of background checks on gun buyers be destroyed after only one business day.

And we needn't imagine that Mr. Ashcroft was deeply concerned about protecting the public's privacy. After all, a few months ago he took the unprecedented step of subpoenaing the hospital records of women who have had late-term abortions.

After my last piece on Mr. Ashcroft, some readers questioned whether he is really the worst attorney general ever. It's true that he has some stiff competition from the likes of John Mitchell, who served under Richard Nixon. But once the full record of his misdeeds in office is revealed, I think Mr. Ashcroft will stand head and shoulders below the rest.


Hmmm.... hiding terrorist activities from us, you say? How very interesting.

And you know how I feel? Not even a little surprised...

Captain Nevarre

_________________
~The fool doth think he is wise, but the wise man knows himself to be a fool~


Tue Jun 22, 2004 12:50 pm
Profile
Nessus
User avatar

Joined: September 2002
Posts: 4383
Location: Hollywood, California
Gender: None specified
Post 
Yeah, I read that today, as well. And no, I'm not surprised. Given this administration's seeming willingness to rewrite our perception of reality as they see fit and with what we know of Ashcroft's personal view of what is best for America, this sort of supression is to be expected.

It is also why it is imperative that those who devote their lives to reporting the news do so in all instances, heedless of the criticism of those who want a partisan view of the world proliferated. The Abu Ghraib prison torture needed to be reported. The hideous murder of any and all persons by al Qaida and all other terrorist factions needs to be reported. Clinton's lie under oath needed to be reported. The lies of the Bush administration need to be reported. We have a right to know the truth.

I can't even imagine how somoeone could think that it was OK to suppress and skew the press. Much as the State must be kept seperate from the Church, so must it be divorced from the Free Press. Government is supposed to support us and keep us safe, not dictate our lives as though we are unruly children and it is a sadistically stringent parent. We don't need Big Brother looking out for us, thank you very much.

_________________
"The sleep of reason breeds monsters" ~Francisco de Goya

"You see, to them you're just a freak . . . like me!" ~The Joker


Tue Jun 22, 2004 1:10 pm
Profile ICQ
Nessus
User avatar

Joined: April 2002
Posts: 2974
Location: Medford, OR
Gender: None specified
Post 
More news on beheadings, this time in Afghanistan

After a translator working for the US as well as an Afghan soldier were beheaded by Taliban forces, the Afghan military responded...by capturing, and beheading, four Taliban fighters.

Maybe this is a message that will get through.

Full story--From alternet, no less

SS

_________________
I'm not starving, I'm not a student, and I'm not 47. But other than that, I like to think of myself as a pretty honest guy.


Tue Jun 22, 2004 4:05 pm
Profile
Nessus
User avatar

Joined: February 2002
Posts: 5603
Location: Los Angeles, CA
Gender: Female
Post 
At this rate, no one in the Middle East will have heads... :?





~blood rose~

_________________
Goth.Net Samurai of Flaming


pink versus black - black versus magenta
this picture of you - just melts in my agenda


Tue Jun 22, 2004 4:13 pm
Profile WWW
Malbolge
User avatar

Joined: May 2004
Posts: 381
Location: Morro Bay, Ca
Gender: None specified
Post 
what is up with the Middle East and cutting people's heads off? ???

_________________
When did I think this was a good name??? I must've been drunk... anyway... back from Iraq if you missed my intro post and I don't think I'll be pissing off any more admins... I'm jumping on the Screw Dubya bandwagon now too!

Anyway... this is me


Tue Jun 22, 2004 7:42 pm
Profile
Cania
User avatar

Joined: January 2002
Posts: 1065
Gender: None specified
Post 
StarvingStudent47 wrote:
Don't get me wrong, I'm not saying that Abu Ghraib wasn't wrong and the soldiers involved shouldn't be court-martialed. But I think it DOES put things in perspective.

No, it really doesn't.
Just because your opponents are monstrous pieces of filth doesn't mean one's own morality get to be adjusted in balance to that.


Wed Jun 23, 2004 6:37 am
Profile WWW
Cania

Joined: May 2003
Posts: 1252
Gender: None specified
Post 
Drain the swamps and the mosquitos will disappear.

It's about high time we actually looked at what causes terrorists to do the things that they do.. get into their minds, so-to-speak to see what makes them tick. They hate America. OK then, shall we take a look back and actually see the kind of things our government has been doing?

* Attempting to overthrow more than 40 foreign governments.

* Unprovoked military invasion of some 20 sovereign nations.

* Working to crush more than 30 populist movements which were fighting against dictatorial regimes.

* Providing indispensable support to a small army of brutal dictatorships: Mobutu of Zaire, Pinochet of Chile, Duvalier of Haiti, Somoza of Nicaragua, the Greek junta, Marcos of the Philippines, Rhee of Korea, the Shah of Iran, 40 years of military dictators in Guatemala, Suharto of Indonesia, Hussein of Iraq, the Brazilian junta, Trujillo of the Dominican Republic, the Taliban of Afghanistan, and others.

* Dropping powerful bombs on the people of about 25 countries, including 40 consecutive days and nights in Iraq, 78 days and nights in Yugoslavia, and several months in Afghanistan, all three of these countries having met the first requirement as an American bombing target -- being completely defenseless. And not once ever has the United States come even close to repairing the great damage caused by its bombings. Afghanistan and Iraq are of course the latest examples.

* Increasing use of depleted uranium, one of the most despicable weapons ever designed by mankind, which produces grossly deformed babies amongst its many endearing qualities, and which, in a civilized world not intimidated by the United States, would be categorically banned.

* Repeated use of cluster bombs, another fiendish device designed by a mad scientist, which has robbed numerous young people of one or more limbs, and some of their eyesight, and continues to do so every day in many countries as the bombs remain on the ground.

* Assassination attempts on the lives of some 40 foreign political leaders.

* Crude interference in dozens of foreign democratic elections.

* Gross manipulation of labor movements.

* Shameless manufacture of "news", the disinformation effect of which is multiplied when CIA assets in other countries pick up the same stories.

* Training of death squads at the School of the Americas in Georgia (a lot of them in Latin & South America)

* Encouragement of drug trafficking in various parts of the world when it served the CIA's purposes.

* Causing grievous harm to the health and well-being of the world's masses by turning the screws of the IMF, World Bank, WTO, and other international financial institutions, as well as by imposing unmerciful sanctions and embargoes.

And there's tons more than that.

Gee, it's no wonder people in the world hate us. We fuck with people who mostly can't fuck back, and when someone does, we're surprised about this. (Britain and Europe have been dealing with terrorism for decades and they haven't gone so overboard as we have with the fascistic laws appearing here like the PATRIOT Act.)

Most Americans have this parochial, I-Don't-Care-What-Happens-Outside-My-Country attitude. I think most of our leaders and governments honestly just don't think of the consequences of their actions.

If we want terrorists to go away, we must abandon these self-defeating practices of Big American Business muscling it's way everywhere (yes, that is what it all boils down to.. Big Business dictating our foreign policy and fucking the economies of other places.)

I close with this passage from Major General Smedly D. Butler:
"It may seem odd for me, a military man, to adopt such a comparison. Truthfulness compels me to. I spent 33 years and 4 months in active service as a member of our country's most agile military force--the Marine Corps. I served in all commissioned ranks from a second lieutenant to Major-General. And during that period I spent most of my time being a high-class muscle man for Big Business, for Wall Street and for the bankers. In short, I was a racketeer for capitalism.

I suspected I was just part of a racket at the time. Now I am sure of it. Like all members of the military profession I never had an original thought until I left the service. My mental faculties remained in suspended animation while I obeyed the orders of the higher-ups. This is typical of everyone in the military service. Thus I helped make Mexico and especially Tampico safe for American oil interests in 1914. I helped make Haiti and Cuba a decent place for the National City Bank boys to collect revenues in. I helped in the raping of half a dozen Central American republics for the benefit of Wall Street. The record of racketeering is long. I helped purify Nicaragua for the international banking house of Brown Brothers in 1909-12. I brought light to the Dominican Republic for American sugar interests in 1916. I helped make Honduras "right" for American fruit companies in 1903. In China in 1927 I helped see to it that Standard Oil went its way unmolested."

Link for the information above was obtained from here


Wed Jun 23, 2004 7:18 am
Profile
Avernus
User avatar

Joined: April 2004
Posts: 5
Location: ROK
Gender: None specified
Post 
Another hostage was beheaded yesterday. This time someone from my country. Don't know who's wrong and who's right but i just hate war.

_________________
Hello, world..............................................


Wed Jun 23, 2004 7:29 am
Profile
Malbolge
User avatar

Joined: May 2004
Posts: 381
Location: Morro Bay, Ca
Gender: None specified
Post 
The war on terror is going to go on for a loooooooong time. We will not stop until we have completely obliterated every Al Qaeda cell... those rats are hiding in almost every country and need to be dug out. :S

_________________
When did I think this was a good name??? I must've been drunk... anyway... back from Iraq if you missed my intro post and I don't think I'll be pissing off any more admins... I'm jumping on the Screw Dubya bandwagon now too!

Anyway... this is me


Wed Jun 23, 2004 11:10 am
Profile
Cania
User avatar

Joined: January 2002
Posts: 1065
Gender: None specified
Post 
surlymcdouchebag wrote:
The war on terror is going to go on for a loooooooong time. We will not stop until we have completely obliterated every Al Qaeda cell... those rats are hiding in almost every country and need to be dug out. :S

I have news for you; Rats breed.

Anyways, hasn't anyone ever seen Red Dawn? If the situation was reversed how many Americans would actually go and do the same thing?
It's not a justification just a sick reality of human behavior.



Edited By Kit on 1088020626


Wed Jun 23, 2004 11:48 am
Profile WWW
Nessus
User avatar

Joined: September 2002
Posts: 4383
Location: Hollywood, California
Gender: None specified
Post 
surlymcdouchebag wrote:
The war on terror is going to go on for a loooooooong time. We will not stop until we have completely obliterated every Al Qaeda cell... those rats are hiding in almost every country and need to be dug out. :S

It had better be about more than al Qaida.

Either we are at war against all terrorists, both abroad and at home, regardless of their affiliation or goals, or we are massive hypocrites. If our only target is al Qaida, then we are not fighting a war, we are seeking revenge; and where I come from, revenge is the refuge of the violent and the cowardly.

_________________
"The sleep of reason breeds monsters" ~Francisco de Goya

"You see, to them you're just a freak . . . like me!" ~The Joker


Wed Jun 23, 2004 1:38 pm
Profile ICQ
Nessus
User avatar

Joined: April 2002
Posts: 2974
Location: Medford, OR
Gender: None specified
Post 
surlymcdouchebag wrote:
The war on terror is going to go on for a loooooooong time.

"Only the dead have seen the end of war." --Plato

_________________
I'm not starving, I'm not a student, and I'm not 47. But other than that, I like to think of myself as a pretty honest guy.


Wed Jun 23, 2004 2:10 pm
Profile
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
This topic is locked, you cannot edit posts or make further replies.   [ 105 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7  Next

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB © 2000, 2002, 2005, 2007 phpBB Group.
Designed by STSoftware for PTF.