View unanswered posts | View active topics It is currently Sun May 19, 2013 6:35 am




Post new topic This topic is locked, you cannot edit posts or make further replies.
Search for:
 [ 13 posts ] 
 Iraq did not help al Qaeda - says 9/11 commission 
Author Message
Nessus
User avatar

Joined: February 2002
Posts: 3691
Location: Eep's couch
Gender: None specified
Post 
In case you haven't heard yet.

From Channel 4 news and from the BBC.

The floor is now open for you lot to discuss this at length, while I stand over here with a ten-foot pole; just in case.

_________________
V4VG.net - A British Gaming Blog


Wed Jun 16, 2004 9:11 am
Profile
Cania
User avatar

Joined: January 2002
Posts: 1065
Gender: None specified
Post 
Chaney is now pushing the Iraq AlQaeda link again... made a statment about it the other day appearantly.


Wed Jun 16, 2004 10:59 am
Profile WWW
Stygia
User avatar

Joined: November 2003
Posts: 193
Gender: None specified
Post 
I don't know of any evidece that ever said they were linked in the first place. Apart from our governments that is!

_________________
The challenge is to be yourself in a world that is trying to make you like everyone else. -- Yurok Indian healing ritual


Wed Jun 16, 2004 11:06 am
Profile
Nessus
User avatar

Joined: February 2002
Posts: 5603
Location: Los Angeles, CA
Gender: Female
Post 
Yeah, but if Bush says it about Iraq, it must be true.



Is ANYONE suprised by this new finding?

I honestly don't know how they think they can pull this crap on the populous. I think that anyone who has ever researched beyond some Fox News sound bites knows full well that the only thing Al Qaeda and Iraq had as a common link was the Q's in their names.

I heard from CNN today that Al Qaeda had approached Iraq at one point asking to use chemical/biological weapons against the US, but that Iraq had ignored them.



~blood rose~

_________________
Goth.Net Samurai of Flaming


pink versus black - black versus magenta
this picture of you - just melts in my agenda


Wed Jun 16, 2004 11:53 am
Profile WWW
Stygia
User avatar

Joined: November 2003
Posts: 193
Gender: None specified
Post 
Sadam Husain may have been a tyrant but he wasn't stupid enough to ask the US to kick his ass directly (not that indirectly stoped them).

_________________
The challenge is to be yourself in a world that is trying to make you like everyone else. -- Yurok Indian healing ritual


Thu Jun 17, 2004 3:53 am
Profile
Nessus
User avatar

Joined: February 2002
Posts: 3691
Location: Eep's couch
Gender: None specified
Post 
blood_rose wrote:
I heard from CNN today that Al Qaeda had approached Iraq at one point asking to use chemical/biological weapons against the US, but that Iraq had ignored them.

~blood rose~

Apparently, during the first Gulf War, Bin Laden asked the CIA to let his Mujaheddin into Iraq to assassinate Saddam. Given Saddam was a secular despot, which goes against Bin Laden's "dream" of a Middle East governed solely by theocratic governments, it's hardly a surprise.

_________________
V4VG.net - A British Gaming Blog


Thu Jun 17, 2004 4:06 am
Profile
Stygia
User avatar

Joined: November 2003
Posts: 193
Gender: None specified
Post 
thetragicclown wrote:
Apparently, during the first Gulf War, Bin Laden asked the CIA to let his Mujaheddin into Iraq to assassinate Saddam. Given Saddam was a secular despot, which goes against Bin Laden's "dream" of a Middle East governed solely by theocratic governments, it's hardly a surprise.

I'd also heard that their ideals clashed and that they were not friendly towards each other, but couldn't remember the details.

_________________
The challenge is to be yourself in a world that is trying to make you like everyone else. -- Yurok Indian healing ritual


Thu Jun 17, 2004 7:54 am
Profile
Stygia
User avatar

Joined: April 2003
Posts: 118
Location: Washington State
Gender: None specified
Post 
Bleh...No kidding.
Jeeze Osama Bin Laden and Saddam hated eachother. They were on opposite sides of the spectrum. Hell, Saddam was running a secular government which was a big smack in the face to Osama. Saddam is the reason Americans stationed their asses in Saudi Arabia which is what really pissed Osama off.
The idea that these two men got together to do the whole 9/11 thing is ridiculous.

_________________
You can hold yourself back from the sufferings of the world, that is something you are free to do and it accords with your nature, but perhaps this very holding back is the one suffering you could avoid. - Franz Kafka


Thu Jun 17, 2004 10:40 am
Profile ICQ WWW
Nessus
User avatar

Joined: February 2002
Posts: 5603
Location: Los Angeles, CA
Gender: Female
Post 
I think that this idea is also ridiculous because it promotes the idea that "all Middle Easterners who oppose the US and Israel are alike" which is not true at all.

Saddam was an enemy of Al Qaeda because of his refusal to institute Sharia in his country.

We had this dangerous mentality during the Cold War when we linked Communist China to the USSR. In reality, the two countries hated eachother, and were competing for communist allies in SE Asia and Latin America. The competition turned out to be far more agressive than our slow "domino effect" theory that was the justification for our involvement in both Korea and Vietnam.



~blood rose~

_________________
Goth.Net Samurai of Flaming


pink versus black - black versus magenta
this picture of you - just melts in my agenda


Thu Jun 17, 2004 11:13 am
Profile WWW
Nessus
User avatar

Joined: April 2002
Posts: 2974
Location: Medford, OR
Gender: None specified
Post 
Rei wrote:
Bleh...No kidding.
Jeeze Osama Bin Laden and Saddam hated eachother. They were on opposite sides of the spectrum. Hell, Saddam was running a secular government which was a big smack in the face to Osama. Saddam is the reason Americans stationed their asses in Saudi Arabia which is what really pissed Osama off.
The idea that these two men got together to do the whole 9/11 thing is ridiculous.

In this particular situation, these two ideologically-opposed people weren't working together. I agree with that. But to state that an ideological difference means that there's NO WAY they would ever ally, or even that such an alliance would be UNLIKELY, is frankly wrong. Just a few such examples of even more insane alliances of the 20th century:

1) WWII: Nazi Germany (Aryan supremacist) and Imperial Japan (not exactly Aryan, huh?)
2) WWII: USA (ultimate capitalist power) and USSR (world Communist leader)
3) WWII: Finland (treated their Jews better than a huge amount of Europe) and Nazi Germany (dedicated to wiping out world Jewry)
4) Cold War: Communists and rich, materialistic Arab dictators
5) Cold War: Capitalists and Muslim Extremists

People often pick allies for reasons besides ideological compatibility. So don't assume that al-Qaeda would never ally with a secular power in order to strike at the USA. This particular situation wasn't such an alliance, but those alliances are very common and we should never ignore such a possibility.

SS

_________________
I'm not starving, I'm not a student, and I'm not 47. But other than that, I like to think of myself as a pretty honest guy.


Thu Jun 17, 2004 7:30 pm
Profile
Cania
User avatar

Joined: January 2002
Posts: 1065
Gender: None specified
Post 
Damnit, now I'm seeing it all over the regular news that the administration is insisting that Iraq and Al Qaeda were linked. I first heard it on Air America and NPR.....

I really wish someone would compile a montage of all the contradictions made from people just within the administration.


Fri Jun 18, 2004 8:02 pm
Profile WWW
Stygia
User avatar

Joined: April 2003
Posts: 118
Location: Washington State
Gender: None specified
Post 
StarvingStudent47 wrote:
People often pick allies for reasons besides ideological compatibility. So don't assume that al-Qaeda would never ally with a secular power in order to strike at the USA. This particular situation wasn't such an alliance, but those alliances are very common and we should never ignore such a possibility.

SS

Very true. I stand corrected. Of course one should try to refrain from using blanket statements in a discussion.
You're right, the possibilty is there however unlikely that it may be.

_________________
You can hold yourself back from the sufferings of the world, that is something you are free to do and it accords with your nature, but perhaps this very holding back is the one suffering you could avoid. - Franz Kafka


Sat Jun 19, 2004 11:21 am
Profile ICQ WWW
Stygia

Joined: April 2003
Posts: 240
Gender: None specified
Post 
Here's an interesting link on this topic. I hope this hasn't been posted before, I haven't been around too much recently and haven't really kept track of all that's been posted.

Clickey Clickey


Sun Jun 20, 2004 11:45 pm
Profile
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
This topic is locked, you cannot edit posts or make further replies.   [ 13 posts ] 

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB © 2000, 2002, 2005, 2007 phpBB Group.
Designed by STSoftware for PTF.