View unanswered posts | View active topics It is currently Sun May 19, 2013 11:28 am




Post new topic This topic is locked, you cannot edit posts or make further replies.
Search for:
 [ 23 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2  Next
 Polygamy in Bountiful - In British Columbia, Canada 
Author Message
Cania
User avatar

Joined: March 2003
Posts: 1801
Location: Ottawa, Canada
Gender: Male
Post 
This is what's currently playing on Canada's National News, The National.

Basically I'd like to know your views on polygamy are, how you think we should addresse cults such as the Fundamentalist Church of Jesus Christ of Latter Day Saints, all the while respecting human rights and the constutional rights of both Canada (as the subject for this thread is in B.C.) and America (as their headquarters is in the U.S.A.).
As a side note, I'd like to point out that the last time police cracked down on the headquarters in America, the raid turned into a political and human rights scandall as wives were seperated from their husband and children taken unto child care, ripping family life apart for a great many people.

As usual I'll be reading your replies much more than I'm likely to be posting.

_________________
~ Express your passions with PASSION!!!


Mon Oct 18, 2004 7:02 pm
Profile
Cania
User avatar

Joined: February 2004
Posts: 1545
Location: everywhere and nowhere
Gender: None specified
Post 
Personally, I don't see any reason at all why people shouldn't be able to have whatever kind of marriage they want. As long as the spouses wish to be married and the children are being taken care of, why should it be anyone else's business? I don't feel that it should be the government's place to make moral judgements on people's beliefs and emotions, and that's one reason that I feel that marriage shouldn't be a legal institution.

The only problem I've seen concerning these groups is that there have been reports in the past of forced marriage and sexual abuse.

_________________
Filthy with love.
Team Tyler's Van


Mon Oct 18, 2004 7:25 pm
Profile
Nessus
User avatar

Joined: August 2002
Posts: 7435
Location: Austin, TX
Gender: Female
Post 
As kitsune said, so long as it's consensual on every side, I don't see why the government has any business stepping in and tearing families apart. It's just another case of the government being influenced by mainstream religion's take on the definition of marriage.

Now, while I don't really agree with the Mormon viewpoint on women's apparent subservient role in the world, I have yet to hear of a woman who was a Mormon and married against her will. I know that the group in question isn't connected with mainstream Mormons which I'm familiar with, but that's the main point of reference I have on such groups.

I think that the way these "cults" as Spidey put it should be addressed is that we should leave them alone. Unless they're doing something harmful like killing people and such, it's not mine or the government's place to tell them who and how to love.

_________________
"He ne'er is crowned with immortality Who fears to follow where airy voices lead."
-John Keats


Mon Oct 18, 2004 7:42 pm
Profile
Maladomini
User avatar

Joined: September 2003
Posts: 576
Location: Arkadelphia, Arkansas, USA
Gender: None specified
Post 
I agree with kitsune and Lunamoth, if they aren't hurting anyone or forcing anyone to do anything agaist thier will, then the government should leave them alone.

And as far as Mormons go, Lunamoth also has it right on. They don't really have a liberal view on roles of women and support these rolls with very weak, barely logical defenseive arguemnts, however, no woman is married off against her choice and it does *not* condone polygamy and certainly not for the reason people think. Members practicing polygamy are excommunicated.

The original supporting argument was that during the times when the Mormon faith was still fairly new and growing vastly, they were all moving out to what is now Utah and Nevada, and they got into several skirmishes with other groups of people (who was at fault, I don't know, but there were some conflicts) and a lot of men were killed during these or they just died during the hard move out. This was at a time when a woman needed a man to take care her, so the surviving men had to take these 'extra' women and their children to help them survive.

However, one of the beliefs of Mormonism, listed as Article of Faith, number twelve "We believe in being subject to kings, presidents, rulers, and magistrates, in obeying, honoring, and sustaining the law." and since polygamy has been outlawed and is no longer necessary, it is no longer in practice. Basically, most Mormons honestly believe a marriage between one woman and one man, like the Heavenly Father and Heavenly Mother, to be ideal.

Like any other group though, there have been disagreements with how things are fun, and there have been several different offshoots that seperated from the followings of whom Mormons consider the one, true, living prophet of God and while they may bear a similar name, they are not related to the Latter Day Saints.

Okay, I think that's enough ranting for tonight...

daladus

_________________
"I'll think of tearing, bloody roots
and revel in her taste"


Mon Oct 18, 2004 9:54 pm
Profile YIM WWW
Stygia
User avatar

Joined: October 2002
Posts: 247
Location: Boston
Gender: None specified
Post 
I agree with kitsune, Lunamoth, and daladus.

The thing only I dislike about it is the fact the kids have to quit school at some point because it only goes up the grade 10(it's somewhere in This interview). I think they should be able to continue school if they wish. And then if they decide "well maybe I don't want to be married yet, I think I'd like to go to college or something like that" they would be able to do that, having finished highschool, then they could come back later and be married.


Mon Oct 18, 2004 10:55 pm
Profile
Cania
User avatar

Joined: December 2002
Posts: 1949
Location: The mountin home of wind and rain.
Gender: None specified
Post 
I'm with Luna, while at this point in my life I dont want to practice polygamy, if all parties are WILLING and of sound mind when the decision is made then I see no harm unless the law pretty much says 'No Polygamy ever' In which case it coems down to which is more important religious law or state law.

_________________
Theres my musings.
Americans will put up with anything provided it doesn't block traffic. - Dan Rather


Tue Oct 19, 2004 7:24 am
Profile
Cania
User avatar

Joined: March 2003
Posts: 1801
Location: Ottawa, Canada
Gender: Male
Post 
Lunamoth wrote:
I think that the way these "cults" as Spidey put it should be addressed is that we should leave them alone. Unless they're doing something harmful like killing people and such, it's not mine or the government's place to tell them who and how to love.

The reason why I used the word "cult" was in reference only to the Fundamentalist Church of Jesus Christ of Latter Day Saints.
My reasons are simple: they trade and move women around like cattle. The women themselves have no way out unless they run away (some do wish to leave) and in some locations every police officer in the area is part of the ring (which is why the state can never maintain a whatchful eye over the people). The individual families are all controlled by a center man (a "prophet") who shuts them off from the outside world, making for a very isolated and often-times barely educated group of individuals.
What's more is that the women are also told that they are not permitted into heaven if they do not do as their husbands tell them to, or fulfill their desires.
In short, if you don't do what you're told, you go to hell.

Obviously I think it's alright if all individuals are conscentual. However, my point was, so I thought, straight forward and simple: along side with your views, what do you think the Canadian and American governements should do?

I'm sorry if I gave the impression that I am of the oppinion that all polygamists follow a cult, as my beliefs aren't so. Once again, I was only refferring to the Fundamentalist Church of Jesus Christ of Latter Day Saints, using the very words of one of the past members.

_________________
~ Express your passions with PASSION!!!


Tue Oct 19, 2004 7:24 am
Profile
Cania
User avatar

Joined: December 2002
Posts: 1949
Location: The mountin home of wind and rain.
Gender: None specified
Post 
Ahh there, I didnt see anywhere that iot wasnt consented to by all parties.

_________________
Theres my musings.
Americans will put up with anything provided it doesn't block traffic. - Dan Rather


Tue Oct 19, 2004 7:51 am
Profile
Cania
User avatar

Joined: March 2003
Posts: 1801
Location: Ottawa, Canada
Gender: Male
Post 
Althalus wrote:
Ahh there, I didnt see anywhere that iot wasnt consented to by all parties.

Concerning the women themselves, I'm mainly bothered that they are given no help from the community if they wish to leave.
Also, allow me to insert a quote.

/div wrote:
Jane Blackmore: Just since I have been a midwife I have a very close relationship with a lot of women in the community. And there was this 15 year old girl who was married and she became pregnant just very soon after she was married and she was crying and she didn't want to be married. She didn't want to be pregnant. She was 15....
[...]
Today Jane has seven children and four grandchildren. She's left Bountiful and dreams of providing a better life for her nine year old daughter.

Jane Blackmore: I don't want to be part of this - and I have a 9-year-old girl who is very intelligent and I don't want her to be married when she is 15 or 16 or 17. I want her to go to school and be the scientist that she dreams about being.

_________________
~ Express your passions with PASSION!!!


Tue Oct 19, 2004 7:57 am
Profile
Cania
User avatar

Joined: February 2004
Posts: 1545
Location: everywhere and nowhere
Gender: None specified
Post 
If there is any suspected criminal activity, there should be an investigation. It goes without saying that the law enforcement officials involved should be highly trained and sensitive to the beliefs of the religious group. Anyone breaking the law should be tried, and any woman or child who feels they would be happier outside the group should be allowed to leave (and given an escort if they feel unsafe). I'm sure there would be many advocacy groups that would be happy to help.

Ideally, the government would overlook the polygamy as enforcing it would be similar to making a law restricting someone's religion, but this isn't a perfect world.

_________________
Filthy with love.
Team Tyler's Van


Tue Oct 19, 2004 7:36 pm
Profile
Nessus
User avatar

Joined: January 2002
Posts: 9249
Location: NY, USA
Gender: Female
Post 
daladus wrote:
however, no woman is married off against her choice and it does *not* condone polygamy and certainly not for the reason people think. Members practicing polygamy are excommunicated.

While this is true for most "mainstream" mormon groups, there are a few off the radar ones that do marry women off against their will, and practice polygamy.

A few months ago a story broke about some of the more cultish mormon groups that own swaths of private land in the middle of nowhere in Utah and Nevada or wherever, and 2 girls had finally escaped from there and those kinds of situations.



Lilith

_________________
Webmistress @ GOTH.NET

SarChasm  (n.)
The gap that exists between the sarcastic person's wit, and the recipient who doesn't get it.


Wed Oct 20, 2004 8:10 am
Profile WWW
Stygia
User avatar

Joined: July 2004
Posts: 141
Location: Hollywood,Ca
Gender: None specified
Post 
Lilith wrote:
A few months ago a story broke about some of the more cultish mormon groups that own swaths of private land in the middle of nowhere in Utah and Nevada or wherever, and 2 girls had finally escaped from there and those kinds of situations.



Lilith

I seen that story on Montel. I believe it was called "the order" They forced a 15 year old to marry her cousin, who was also her nephew! A missionary finally convinced her to get out, and she is now living a normal life, and she pressed incest charges on her cousin/nephew/husband, and he is now serving time.


Wed Oct 20, 2004 8:44 am
Profile
Nessus
User avatar

Joined: January 2002
Posts: 9249
Location: NY, USA
Gender: Female
Post 
hollywoodpinup wrote:
Lilith wrote:
A few months ago a story broke about some of the more cultish mormon groups that own swaths of private land in the middle of nowhere in Utah and Nevada or wherever, and 2 girls had finally escaped from there and those kinds of situations.



Lilith

I seen that story on Montel. I believe it was called "the order" They forced a 15 year old to marry her cousin, who was also her nephew! A missionary finally convinced her to get out, and she is now living a normal life, and she pressed incest charges on her cousin/nephew/husband, and he is now serving time.

Yeah. Though the story I read was a different one I think, but there have been several incidents like this.

It does happen, though it's very important to realise that this isn't stuff that's condoned by the Mormon church, the mainstream well-known version anyway.

Every group has it's extreme whackos, that's the Mormon church's version.



Lilith

_________________
Webmistress @ GOTH.NET

SarChasm  (n.)
The gap that exists between the sarcastic person's wit, and the recipient who doesn't get it.


Wed Oct 20, 2004 10:36 am
Profile WWW
Malbolge
User avatar

Joined: June 2004
Posts: 257
Location: Arkansas
Gender: None specified
Post 
His first wife Jane,

[/quote]
This is probibly way off but;
Kinda reminds me of a King of the Hill Episode...
What's your name?
Jane
And your's?
Jane
You're both named Jane?
We're all Janes now.
We love you Jane...we love you... :b

Of course in this case it's polygamists instead of meat deprived Janes.


Wed Oct 20, 2004 1:56 pm
Profile WWW
Nessus
User avatar

Joined: September 2002
Posts: 4383
Location: Hollywood, California
Gender: None specified
Post 
Nachty fun fact:

My first serious girlfriend became a polyamorist (not exactly the same as a polygamist, but fairly close) pretty much right after our relationship ended.

I have to admit that as an 18 year old, that was a damn big pill to swallow. However, it definitely opened my eyes to the fact that one-on-one matrimonial pairings, while certainly the majority, are not the end all and be all of acceptable human relationships. Personally, I could not imagine being married to, or even significantly involved with more than one person at a time, but I know several well-adjusted, caring people who are quite happy doing just that. When it comes to love, I don't believe in assigning black and white judgments so long as all involved are consenting adults. Love is love, regardless of the form it takes.

If folks sincerely want to marry each other, in any combination of gender and/or number, I think that the only crime is in standing in their way. The world can be a pretty cold place, and I know first hand that the best way to warm it up is to wrap yourself up in a fluffy blanket of love. In my case, said blanket is made up of just one woman, and she was hard enough to find; if other folks manage to complete their souls through less "conventional" means, I wish them nothing but the very best.

Love, like morality, is both impossible and inhumane to legislate.

~Nachtzehrer~

_________________
"The sleep of reason breeds monsters" ~Francisco de Goya

"You see, to them you're just a freak . . . like me!" ~The Joker


Thu Oct 21, 2004 1:50 am
Profile ICQ
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
This topic is locked, you cannot edit posts or make further replies.   [ 23 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2  Next

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB © 2000, 2002, 2005, 2007 phpBB Group.
Designed by STSoftware for PTF.